Dmitriy Smirnov
February 12, 2025
Firm News

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court in Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, 144 S. Ct. 1570 (2024) rejected the historically lenient standard used by some federal agencies when seeking preliminary injunctions, instead reaffirming that courts must apply the traditional four-factor test. While Starbucks, a case that involved the National Labor Relations Board, was an important decision in reaffirming equitable principles,

Dmitriy Smirnov
February 3, 2025
Firm News

A subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is a formal request for documents or testimony related to an investigation into potential violations of federal securities laws. The SEC frequently issues subpoenas as part of its broader investigative process, particularly in cases involving suspected insider trading, securities fraud, or market manipulation. While receiving a subpoena does not necessarily imply

Dmitriy Smirnov
February 3, 2025
Securities Law

If you’ve been served with an SEC subpoena, it’s likely you are facing a stressful and uncertain situation. A subpoena is an official request from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to produce documents, provide testimony, or both, as part of an investigation into potential violations of securities laws. While receiving a subpoena does not necessarily mean you are under

Dmitriy Smirnov
January 7, 2025
Securities Law

Insider trading accusations can severely damage reputations, careers, and company credibility. Several recent cases involving high-profile executives emphasize the importance of adhering to best practices for compliance with securities laws. Below, we outline essential strategies for corporate leaders to avoid accusations of insider trading, using recent cases as cautionary tales. Understand and Respect Blackout Periods A blackout period is a

Dmitriy Smirnov
January 7, 2025
Securities Law

Transparency in investor advisory fees is not just a regulatory requirement—it reflects integrity. But when disputes arise, defending the legitimacy of advisory fees becomes a nuanced challenge, often hinging on whether those fees were adequately disclosed and justified. Recent cases have brought this issue to the forefront, highlighting both the pitfalls of poor communication and the importance of proactive transparency.

TOP