Litigation & Arbitration

AAA Arbitrations

Representation of companies and individuals in commercial arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association and its international division, the ICDR.

Overview

The American Arbitration Association (AAA) is the leading administrator of commercial arbitration in the United States, and AAA arbitration clauses appear in a large share of commercial contracts: supply agreements, joint ventures, distribution and licensing arrangements, shareholder and partnership agreements, and construction and services contracts. When a dispute under one of those contracts arises, it is resolved not in court but before one or three arbitrators under the AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules. The substantive disputes (breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and business torts) mirror those litigated in court, but the forum, the procedure, and the strategy are different.

Fridman Fels & Soto represents claimants and respondents in AAA commercial arbitration as part of its complex commercial litigation practice. Michael Garcia brings a decade of commercial litigation and investigations experience from White & Case, and Daniel Fridman brings extensive federal-court litigation experience, both of which translate directly to the arbitral forum, where the merits of a commercial dispute are tried before arbitrators rather than a judge and jury.

For cross-border commercial disputes, the AAA's international division, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), administers arbitration involving parties in different countries. The firm's Latin America focus makes it well suited to commercial arbitration involving Latin American counterparties, where the dispute spans jurisdictions, languages, and legal traditions.

Our Approach

Arbitration strategy begins with the arbitration clause itself: the rules it invokes, the seat, the scope of arbitrable issues, and the method of arbitrator selection. Arbitrator selection is the single most consequential decision in an arbitration; there is no jury and, in most cases, no meaningful appeal, so the arbitrator's background, experience, and analytical frame shape the outcome more than in court. We approach panel selection deliberately and with attention to the specific subject matter of the dispute.

Because discovery in arbitration is more limited than in federal court and the grounds for vacating an award are narrow, the evidentiary record and the merits presentation must be built early and presented completely at the hearing. There is rarely a second chance to correct the record on appeal. We prepare AAA arbitrations with the same rigor applied to a trial, while taking advantage of the speed, privacy, and finality that make arbitration valuable to commercial parties.

Representative Experience

Complex Commercial Litigation & Arbitration

  • Recovery of a $20M inheritance lost to adviser fraud

    Pursues recovery for an Argentine client defrauded of a roughly $20 million inheritance, pressing the banks and advisers across three forums at once: FINRA arbitration, AAA arbitration, and civil litigation in Miami, with claims exceeding $10 million.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is AAA arbitration different from going to court?

Arbitration is a private dispute-resolution process the parties agreed to in their contract, rather than a public court proceeding. The dispute is decided by one or three arbitrators the parties participate in selecting, not by a judge and jury. Discovery is generally more limited and faster than in federal court, the hearing is private and confidential, and the schedule is usually shorter. The trade-off is finality: an arbitration award is subject to only very narrow judicial review, so there is effectively no appeal on the merits. An award can be confirmed by a court and enforced like a judgment under the Federal Arbitration Act.

Can an AAA arbitration award be appealed or overturned?

Only on very narrow grounds. Under the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 10), a court may vacate an arbitration award only for reasons such as fraud or corruption in procuring the award, evident partiality of an arbitrator, arbitrator misconduct that prejudiced a party, or the arbitrators exceeding their powers. A court will not vacate an award simply because the arbitrators got the facts or the law wrong. This limited review is why the hearing itself is decisive; the record and arguments presented to the panel are, in practice, the only opportunity to win the case.

Our commercial contract has an AAA arbitration clause and the counterparty just filed a demand for arbitration. What are the first steps?

First, read the arbitration clause closely with counsel: it dictates the governing rules (AAA Commercial Rules, Construction Rules, or ICDR international rules), the seat, the number of arbitrators, and the scope of what must be arbitrated, and whether the dispute the counterparty raised actually falls within it. Some disputes, or some parties, may not be bound to arbitrate, and a threshold arbitrability challenge can sometimes be raised in court. Second, calendar the deadlines: the AAA rules set strict time limits to file an answering statement and any counterclaims, and missing them carries consequences. Third, begin arbitrator selection planning immediately; the AAA will send a roster, and the strike-and-rank process that follows is the most important strategic decision in the case. Fourth, preserve documents and identify the witnesses and evidence the merits will turn on, since discovery is limited and the record must be built early. Engaging counsel at the demand stage, rather than after the panel is seated, preserves every one of these options.

Team

Facing a government investigation?

Time matters. Contact us before the first interview request.

Contact the Firm