White Collar Defense, Internal Investigations, & Regulatory Compliance

Former federal prosecutors. Proven results at trial.

Federal criminal defense by former DOJ prosecutors, from pre-indictment advocacy through jury trial.

Overview

When the Department of Justice investigates someone, it does so quietly, building its case for months or years before the target knows the investigation exists. By the time a grand jury subpoena arrives, a search warrant is executed, or a target letter appears, the government has typically already secured financial records, interviewed cooperating witnesses, and developed a theory of the case. The window to shape that process, to prevent charges, narrow their scope, or establish the defense narrative before the government's version hardens, closes fast.

The firm's founding partners include a former AUSA who delivered the opening statement in the prosecution of Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, a former Senior Counsel to the Deputy Attorney General who coordinated healthcare fraud enforcement across DOJ divisions, and a former Deputy Chief AUSA and SEC Senior Trial Attorney. Their experience shaping how those decisions are made (how the government sequences evidence for trial, which factual gaps matter most in the charging analysis, and where legal theories are most vulnerable) is the analytical foundation of every defense.

The practice spans health care fraud, False Claims Act, money laundering, FCPA, grand jury investigations, pharmaceutical enforcement, antitrust, and federal criminal defense across industries. Past results include a full jury acquittal in a $12 million Medicare fraud prosecution the DOJ had publicly promoted as an enforcement precedent; a sentencing outcome at the 0-6 month range where the government sought 15 months; and early termination of a five-year federal probationary sentence after the client served 40% of the term.

The “extremely smart, diligent and effective” Daniel Fridman is sought after for his experience representing both individuals and corporations involved in DOJ investigations and white-collar criminal cases.
Chambers USA

Government Experience on the Team

  • Senior Counsel to the Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
  • Assistant United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida (opening statement in the El Chapo prosecution)
  • Deputy Chief Assistant United States Attorney and SEC Senior Trial Attorney
  • Director of the SEC's Miami Regional Office

We have prosecuted and regulated the same conduct we now defend. That is the vantage point clients hire.

Practice Areas

Representative Experience

White Collar & Government Investigations

  • False Claims Act Defense of a U.S. State Government Agency

    Selected through a competitive process as lead counsel for a U.S. state agency in a DOJ Civil Division False Claims Act investigation over alleged quality-control fraud in a federal benefits program. The government's demand exceeded $40 million, reflecting the treble damages and per-claim civil penalties available under the FCA. Resolved for $17.5 million, a fraction of the government's original demand; Mr. Fridman signed the settlement on the agency's behalf.

  • Confidential DOJ defense – Gunvor / PetroEcuador bribery scheme

    Represented a Canadian national and former Gunvor employee charged in the Eastern District of New York with conspiring to launder proceeds of an approximately $22 million bribery scheme involving Ecuador's state oil company, PetroEcuador. Gunvor S.A., the Swiss energy trading company, separately pleaded guilty in March 2024 to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and paid a $374.56 million criminal fine as part of a $474.4 million global resolution, admitting it paid intermediaries more than $97 million between 2012 and 2020 to bribe PetroEcuador officials to obtain and retain oil-trading business. Covered by Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, and international press.

  • Toshiba International Corporation internal investigation

    Led an internal investigation for Toshiba International Corporation that traced a bribery and bid-rigging scheme in which a facilities manager steered more than $100 million in construction contracts to two favored companies in exchange for payments in cash, gold and silver bars, real estate, guns, jewelry, and watches, causing Toshiba a loss of more than $80 million, then filed a civil RICO suit in Houston in 2019 and presented the evidence to federal prosecutors; the perpetrators pled guilty and were sentenced to prison, one business owner to nine years in the Southern District of Texas.

  • Global bank AML enforcement action

    Represented a global financial institution in a U.S. regulatory enforcement action concerning its anti-money laundering compliance program.

  • Congressional inquiry into nonprofit organizations

    Represent, pro bono under the firm's rule-of-law and democracy-protection initiative, four nonprofit organizations targeted in a Congressional inquiry into their use of federal funds.

  • Grand jury investigation involving national security issues

    Assisted the corporation with its responses to grand jury subpoenas in a DOJ investigation involving national security issues.

  • DOJ antitrust price-fixing investigation; client cleared

    Conducted a full internal investigation in response to government subpoenas in a DOJ antitrust price-fixing investigation, demonstrating the client's lack of involvement in the charged conspiracy; other individuals charged were subsequently acquitted. In a separate DOJ antitrust investigation of a former company officer, the firm's internal investigation led the DOJ to close its inquiry.

  • Public company audit-committee investigation

    Engaged by a public company's CEO to assist an audit-committee investigation into allegations concerning personal-versus-business expenses.

  • Audit-committee FCPA internal investigation

    Represented an audit committee in an internal investigation into alleged FCPA violations, including coordination with outside auditors on the committee's remediation and disclosure obligations.

  • Corporate-misconduct internal investigation

    Led a corporate-misconduct investigation into kickbacks, asset misappropriation, and conflicts of interest at a corporate subsidiary.

  • House committee inquiry into immigration nonprofits

    Co-led the pro bono representation, under the firm's rule-of-law initiative, of four nonprofit immigration-assistance organizations targeted in a House Committee on Homeland Security inquiry into the use of federal funds by more than 200 NGOs.

  • Unlicensed money-remittance prosecution

    Represents a client charged in the Southern District of Florida with money laundering arising from allegations of unlicensed money remitting, in a case involving over $350 million and among the largest of its kind ever brought by the federal government. The client is in Argentina awaiting extradition proceedings.

  • DOJ price-fixing probe of industry executives

    Assisted on internal investigations connected to a DOJ price-fixing probe involving industry executives, work that helped establish a client's non-involvement.

  • Pharmaceutical misbranding prosecution

    Secured a probationary sentence for a client charged with misbranding pharmaceutical compounds purchased from China, after the government sought 18 months' imprisonment.

  • Special Counsel investigation grand jury witness

    Represented a grand jury witness in Special Counsel John Durham's investigation into the predication of the inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, conducting an investigation and preparing the client for grand jury testimony.

  • USAO and OFAC sanctions investigation

    Represents a client under investigation by both the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Office of Foreign Assets Control for alleged violations of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and money laundering, with cross-border exposure to Russia.

Securities & SEC Enforcement

  • DOJ insider-trading investigation; client not charged

    Represented a Senior Vice President of a Fortune 1000 technology company in a DOJ insider-trading investigation. The related prosecution resulted in a guilty plea by the charged individual; our client was not charged.

Healthcare Fraud

  • Full acquittal of medical billing supervisor

    Secured a full acquittal for Kenia Valle Boza after a two-week jury trial in June 2025 in the Southern District of Florida, defeating the Department of Justice's novel theory extending health-care-fraud, wire-fraud conspiracy, and major-fraud liability to a billing-coding supervisor in a case the government framed at roughly $12 million.

  • Compounding pharmacy CEO sentencing and FCA defense

    Held Patient Care America's CEO to the 0-to-6-month guideline range in February 2024, well below the fifteen months the government sought, after a four-day sentencing tied to a TRICARE fraud valued near $40 million; the firm also handled the civil False Claims Act phase, which resolved in 2019 for more than $65 million with a $21.36 million payment.

  • Health care fraud sentencing and probation relief

    Represented a client charged with health care fraud in connection with a family member's scheme, helping the client cooperate, reducing restitution, and obtaining a sentence below the Guidelines that avoided incarceration. The firm later obtained early termination of probation after the client served roughly 40% of the term.

  • Nurse-witness in a $192M Medicare fraud prosecution

    Persuaded the DOJ not to charge a nurse employed by a nurse practitioner under federal indictment for a $192 million health care fraud conspiracy. The client cooperated and testified at trial, where the nurse practitioner was convicted and sentenced to 20 years, and has since resumed her career.

Latin America & Cross-Border

  • Oro Negro bondholders Section 1782 discovery

    Represent Oro Negro bondholders in an active cross-border effort to trace at least $27 million diverted from special purpose vehicles that held bonds tied to Pemex oil drilling rigs off the coast of Mexico, using 28 U.S.C. Section 1782 to compel discovery in the United States, including discovery sought from opposing counsel Quinn Emanuel over roughly $8 million traceable to client accounts.

  • Confidential DOJ defense – Gunvor executive, PetroEcuador bribery scheme

    Worked on the defense of a former Gunvor executive charged in the Eastern District of New York in connection with an approximately $22 million PetroEcuador bribery scheme. Gunvor S.A., the Swiss energy trading company, separately pleaded guilty in March 2024 to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and paid a $374.56 million criminal fine as part of a $474.4 million global resolution, admitting it paid intermediaries more than $97 million between 2012 and 2020 to bribe PetroEcuador officials to obtain and retain oil-trading business.

  • Mexican oil-drilling company internal investigation

    Conducted an internal investigation of accounting and internal-control deficiencies at a Mexican oil-drilling company.

  • Confidential DOJ defense – Gunvor / PetroEcuador bribery scheme

    Represented a Canadian national and former Gunvor employee charged in the Eastern District of New York with conspiring to launder proceeds of a roughly $22 million bribery scheme involving Ecuador's state oil company, PetroEcuador. Gunvor S.A., the Swiss energy trading company, separately pleaded guilty in March 2024 to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and paid a $374.56 million criminal fine as part of a $474.4 million global resolution, admitting it paid intermediaries more than $97 million between 2012 and 2020 to bribe PetroEcuador officials to obtain and retain oil-trading business. Covered by Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, and international press.

  • Parallel U.S. and EU telecom price-fixing investigation

    Represents a Latin American executive of a leading telecommunications company under simultaneous investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division and the European Commission over alleged price fixing in mobile voice and data markets across Latin America and the Caribbean, managing parallel proceedings in the United States, Panama, and Jamaica.

Frequently Asked Questions

Federal agents just executed a search warrant on our offices. What must we do (and not do) in the next 24 hours?

Do not engage with agents beyond confirming identity and requesting a copy of the warrant and agent credentials. Implement a litigation hold immediately; no documents, emails, or communications may be deleted from any system. Contact outside defense counsel before the search concludes if possible, and before allowing any employee to submit to an interview. Federal agents will typically attempt to interview employees on-site during the search; employees have the right to decline, and that right should be exercised until counsel is present and has reviewed the scope of the warrant. The warrant specifies what agents are authorized to seize; counsel should review it on-site and document anything taken that falls outside that scope. Do not ask agents what the investigation concerns or attempt to provide context; voluntary statements during a search can create exposure that wouldn't otherwise exist.

We are under simultaneous investigation by both the DOJ and the SEC based on the same conduct. How do we manage the tension between the two proceedings?

Parallel DOJ and SEC investigations are among the most consequential situations a company or executive can face. Every decision in one proceeding carries consequences in the other: documents produced to the SEC are potentially available to DOJ prosecutors; testimony given in an SEC proceeding can be used in a criminal case; a civil settlement with the SEC may include factual admissions that become the foundation of a subsequent criminal prosecution. There is no universal rule about which agency to engage first. The analysis turns on the relative stage of each investigation, what each agency appears to be focused on, and whether cooperation with one accelerates or complicates the other. The first and most important step is to ensure that a single team of counsel has full visibility into both proceedings and can coordinate strategy across them simultaneously.

I received a target letter from the Department of Justice. What should I do?

A target letter means prosecutors have substantial evidence linking you to a federal crime and are weighing charges; it is often one of the last steps before an indictment. Do not contact the prosecutor, the agents, or anyone involved in the underlying events, and do not alter or delete any documents. Retain defense counsel immediately: in the window before a charging decision, counsel can learn the government's theory, correct misimpressions, and in some cases persuade prosecutors to decline or narrow charges.

What is the difference between a witness, a subject, and a target of a federal investigation?

In DOJ practice, a witness has relevant information but is not suspected of wrongdoing; a subject is someone whose conduct falls within the scope of the investigation; a target is someone the prosecutor has substantial evidence against and is likely to charge. Status matters because it shapes whether to testify, produce documents, or negotiate, and it can change as the investigation develops. Counsel can often learn a client's status directly from the prosecution and monitor it throughout.

When does a company need an internal investigation?

When credible allegations of significant misconduct surface, through a whistleblower, an audit finding, a government subpoena, or the press, an internal investigation lets the company establish the facts before regulators do. Done properly, it is directed by counsel to preserve privilege, independent of the employees involved, and scoped to answer the questions that drive real decisions: remediation, discipline, disclosure, and defense. A flawed investigation can be worse than none, because enforcement authorities judge the company's response as closely as the underlying conduct.

Team

Facing a government investigation?

Time matters. Contact us before the first interview request.

Contact the Firm