White Collar Defense, Internal Investigations, & Regulatory Compliance

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Defense in DOJ and SEC investigations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Overview

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act makes it a federal crime for U.S. companies, persons, and certain foreign issuers to pay bribes to foreign government officials. FCPA enforcement has intensified dramatically, with the DOJ and SEC pursuing individual criminal prosecutions alongside major corporate deferred prosecution agreements.

Our FCPA practice draws on deep Latin America expertise. Daniel Fridman has led FCPA investigations in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Colombia for multinationals facing SEC and DOJ scrutiny. Michael Garcia, a decade-long Latin America investigations partner at White & Case, has led FCPA internal investigations for audit committees across the hemisphere.

Our Approach

FCPA matters almost always begin with an internal investigation, triggered by a whistleblower, a government subpoena, or self-discovery. The internal investigation frames everything that follows: how the company presents itself to regulators, whether voluntary disclosure is appropriate, and what remediation can influence the government's charging and penalty decisions. We have led major investigations across Latin America for companies and audit committees, and represent executives and employees who need their own independent counsel.

Representative Experience

White Collar & Government Investigations

  • Confidential DOJ defense – Gunvor / PetroEcuador bribery scheme

    Represented a Canadian national and former Gunvor employee charged in the Eastern District of New York with conspiring to launder proceeds of an approximately $22 million bribery scheme involving Ecuador's state oil company, PetroEcuador. Gunvor S.A., the Swiss energy trading company, separately pleaded guilty in March 2024 to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and paid a $374.56 million criminal fine as part of a $474.4 million global resolution, admitting it paid intermediaries more than $97 million between 2012 and 2020 to bribe PetroEcuador officials to obtain and retain oil-trading business. Covered by Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, and international press.

  • Audit-committee FCPA internal investigation

    Represented an audit committee in an internal investigation into alleged FCPA violations, including coordination with outside auditors on the committee's remediation and disclosure obligations.

Securities & SEC Enforcement

  • SEC FCPA whistleblower representation

    Represents a whistleblower with first-hand evidence of bribes paid by a U.S. public company's subsidiary, supporting a potential FCPA enforcement action with exposure exceeding $30 million across cross-border operations.

Latin America & Cross-Border

  • Confidential DOJ defense – Gunvor executive, PetroEcuador bribery scheme

    Worked on the defense of a former Gunvor executive charged in the Eastern District of New York in connection with an approximately $22 million PetroEcuador bribery scheme. Gunvor S.A., the Swiss energy trading company, separately pleaded guilty in March 2024 to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and paid a $374.56 million criminal fine as part of a $474.4 million global resolution, admitting it paid intermediaries more than $97 million between 2012 and 2020 to bribe PetroEcuador officials to obtain and retain oil-trading business.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can be prosecuted under the FCPA?

The FCPA applies to: U.S. companies and their employees and agents worldwide; U.S. citizens and permanent residents regardless of location; and foreign companies and individuals who take any act in furtherance of a bribe within the U.S. The accounting provisions apply to issuers (companies with U.S. securities registrations) and their subsidiaries.

Our audit committee's internal investigation found evidence of payments to government officials through a Latin American subsidiary. Do we have to disclose this to the DOJ and SEC?

You don't have to, but the framework governing that decision is among the most consequential in corporate criminal law. The DOJ's FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy creates strong incentives for voluntary disclosure: companies that voluntarily self-disclose, fully cooperate, and timely remediate receive a presumption of declination, meaning no criminal charges. Companies that cooperate but do not self-disclose receive a reduced penalty, without the declination presumption. The analysis turns on several factors: (1) How serious is the conduct, isolated incident or systematic pattern? (2) How much evidence exists and could the DOJ find it independently through a whistleblower, a third-country investigation, or another company's cooperation? (3) Has the company already begun remediation? (4) Are there parallel proceedings (SEC disclosure obligations, foreign regulatory requirements, or local anti-corruption law) that run on their own timelines? Voluntary disclosure is irreversible. Once made, the company is committed to full cooperation and cannot control how the DOJ characterizes the conduct. This decision must be made with full analysis by experienced FCPA counsel, not under pressure of a disclosure deadline.

Are facilitation payments legal under the FCPA?

The FCPA contains a narrow exception for small payments to secure routine, non-discretionary government action, but relying on it is hazardous: the exception is construed narrowly, the payments are almost always illegal under the local law of the country where they are made, and other regimes such as the U.K. Bribery Act prohibit them outright. Most multinational compliance programs ban facilitation payments entirely, and enforcement authorities treat a pattern of them as evidence of a broader corruption problem.

How long do FCPA investigations take, and how do they usually end?

Corporate FCPA investigations commonly run two to four years, longer when multiple countries are involved. They resolve across a wide spectrum: declination (increasingly available for companies that self-disclose, cooperate, and remediate), non-prosecution or deferred prosecution agreements, guilty pleas, and parallel SEC resolutions with disgorgement and penalties. Individual outcomes are separate from the company's, and the government has prioritized individual prosecutions, which is why executives need their own counsel early.

Team

Facing a government investigation?

Time matters. Contact us before the first interview request.

Contact the Firm