Litigation & Arbitration

Parallel Civil & Criminal Proceedings

Integrated defense strategy when SEC civil enforcement and DOJ criminal proceedings run simultaneously.

Overview

When the SEC and DOJ are both investigating the same conduct, every decision (what to produce to the SEC, whether to settle the civil case, whether to cooperate with the DOJ) can have consequences in both proceedings simultaneously. A cooperation agreement with the SEC can result in production of incriminating documents in a criminal case. Navigating these interactions requires integrated strategy across both proceedings.

Alejandro Soto's combination of SEC enforcement and federal prosecution experience means he approaches every securities matter with both frameworks in mind simultaneously. His active representations in a $100M+ cryptocurrency fund matter (SEC enforcement + parallel DOJ criminal exposure) and EagleStone (SEC + FINRA parallel investigations) reflect daily engagement with this complex terrain.

Our Approach

The fundamental principle in parallel proceeding defense is that every statement and document produced in the civil proceeding may end up in front of a criminal jury. We coordinate civil and criminal defense strategy from the first day, ensuring that decisions in one proceeding do not compromise the client's position in the other.

Representative Experience

Securities & SEC Enforcement

  • Parallel SEC and USAO securities investigation

    Counseled a subject of parallel SEC and U.S. Attorney's Office securities investigations, negotiating a settlement of disgorgement exposure with the SEC receiver.

  • Investment-adviser fee-fraud investigation

    Investigated and advised an investment adviser facing civil fraud allegations of charging improper fees exceeding $10 million to high-net-worth clients, counseling on both civil and potential criminal exposure.

  • SEC and DOJ accounting-restatement investigation

    Represents a Latin America-based employee of a U.S. public company in a parallel SEC and DOJ accounting-restatement investigation involving restatements exceeding $100 million, on referral from an Am Law 20 law firm.

Cryptocurrency & Digital Assets

  • SEC emergency crypto-fund enforcement action

    Represents the co-founder of a cryptocurrency fund in an SEC emergency action alleging a Ponzi scheme the agency framed at roughly $100 million in a vehicle that had held around $150 million, while managing parallel exposure as the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida evaluates a potential criminal case. The matter is ongoing.

  • Crypto fund co-founder SEC emergency action defense

    Represents the co-founder of a cryptocurrency fund that held roughly $150 million in assets in an SEC emergency enforcement action alleging a $100 million Ponzi scheme, while managing simultaneous parallel criminal exposure in the Southern District of Florida.

Latin America & Cross-Border

  • Oro Negro bondholders Section 1782 discovery

    Represent Oro Negro bondholders in an active cross-border effort to trace at least $27 million diverted from special purpose vehicles that held bonds tied to Pemex oil drilling rigs off the coast of Mexico, using 28 U.S.C. Section 1782 to compel discovery in the United States, including discovery sought from opposing counsel Quinn Emanuel over roughly $8 million traceable to client accounts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an individual assert the Fifth Amendment in an SEC civil investigation?

Yes, but the SEC (in a civil proceeding) and a civil jury can draw an adverse inference from the assertion; the fact-finder can conclude the testimony would have been unfavorable. This is different from criminal proceedings, where Fifth Amendment assertions cannot be used against the defendant. The decision whether to assert the Fifth in a parallel proceeding requires careful analysis of both civil and criminal exposure.

The SEC entered a civil judgment against my client for securities fraud. Does a subsequent criminal prosecution for the same conduct violate double jeopardy?

No. SEC civil enforcement actions are civil proceedings, not criminal. The Double Jeopardy Clause bars a second criminal prosecution after a first criminal prosecution for the same offense; it does not bar a criminal prosecution following a civil proceeding, even one involving the same conduct. The Supreme Court's decision in Hudson v. United States (1997) established that civil penalties do not trigger double jeopardy protections. An SEC civil judgment, including an injunction, disgorgement, and civil monetary penalty, does not preclude subsequent criminal prosecution by the DOJ for the same conduct. In fact, civil SEC settlements frequently include factual admissions that become evidence in subsequent criminal proceedings. This is a critical consideration when evaluating whether to settle an SEC civil matter before the DOJ has concluded its criminal investigation; any civil settlement must be structured with full awareness of what it may establish in a criminal case.

Should we seek a stay of the civil case while the criminal investigation is pending?

Sometimes, and it cuts both ways. Courts have discretion to stay civil proceedings, or just discovery, while a parallel criminal matter runs, weighing the overlap between the cases, the stage of the criminal matter, and the prejudice to each side. A stay can protect a defendant from choosing between the Fifth Amendment and a civil defense, but it also freezes the chance to win the civil case early. The decision is strategic, not automatic, and should be made with both proceedings in view.

If we settle with the SEC, can the settlement be used against us in a criminal case?

A standard SEC settlement is entered without admitting or denying the allegations, which prevents the settlement itself from operating as an admission. But everything produced to the SEC, including testimony, documents, and interview statements, remains available to criminal prosecutors, and the settled complaint's factual allegations can still shape how the DOJ views the case. Settling the civil matter without first mapping the criminal exposure is one of the most common and costly mistakes in parallel proceedings.

Team

Facing a government investigation?

Time matters. Contact us before the first interview request.

Contact the Firm